Re: raid5 failed logical and physically; how to reconstruct?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 4:26 PM, David Lethe <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-raid-
>> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Schriever
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 2:52 PM
>> To: linux-raid
>> Subject: raid5 failed logical and physically; how to reconstruct?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> having used mdadm and linux for slightly over a year now to great
>> pleasure I came to face a problem. My raid5 got degraded due to hard
>> disc failure. After this some form of logical damage also occurred.
>>
>> Everytime I wish to mount md0 I get an error from the system telling
>> it's unable to mount, something wrong with the superblock.
>>
>> I tried to rebuild the array, without formatting the discs, and using
>> a windows based tool I can still see that data is available, but
>> garbled.
>>
>> Is there any way of recovering the array, and to recover my data? I am
>> not a big linux guru and any tutorial / steps to take would be very
>> much appreciated!
>>
>> yours
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid"
>> in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Well, there are ways to recover it, but it comes down to how much damage
> you started out with;  what damage (if any), the windows-based tool
> might have done; whether or not you have unreadable blocks on surviving
> disks.   If you just force a rebuild onto the new disk drive, then you
> will absolutely make it worse.
>
> If data loss could be in the thousands of dollars range, then I wouldn't
> use a cookbook recovery.  Somebody who knows what they are doing and who
> is directly involved will get more of your data back, and can look at
> the raw blocks to see what is going on.  They may also look at the disk
> that "failed" and perhaps get data from that disk.
>
> I would immediately make raw copies of each physical device before going
> further.  Hopefully you can pick up a cheap 1TB SATA disk and dd
> everything onto it.  Not only can you play with a copy of the data, but
> since you just lost a disk drive, then odds are high that another disk
> in the RAID set will die.   Just one more drive failure and you have
> 100% data loss.
>
> David

Assuming the gurus here can't help you --

If you put the above dd images onto a NTFS based partition, then you
can buy Raid Reconstructor from RunTime Software for about $100 and
try to rebuild your via it. There is a free trial that you can test
with I believe.  I've forgotten if you can actually attempt a rebuild
via the trial product.

It runs in Windows thus the need for NTFS to hold the dd images of the
physical drives.

Good Luck
Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
Litigation Triage Solutions Specialist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregfreemyer
First 99 Days Litigation White Paper -
http://www.norcrossgroup.com/forms/whitepapers/99%20Days%20whitepaper.pdf

The Norcross Group
The Intersection of Evidence & Technology
http://www.norcrossgroup.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux