Dear Ilya &Yrui,
In message <1220478231-8725-1-git-send-email-yanok@xxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
>
> Should clear the next pointer of the TX if we are sure that the
> next TX (say NXT) will be submitted to the channel too. Overwise,
> we break the chain of descriptors, because we lose the information
> about the next descriptor to run. So next time, when invoke
> async_tx_run_dependencies() with TX, it's TX->next will be NULL, and
> NXT will be never submitted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
What about this patch? SHould it be applied to our repository?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@xxxxxxx
The use of Microsoft crippleware systems is a sin that carries with
it its own punishment.
-- Tom Christiansen in <6bo3fr$pj8$5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
