From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@xxxxxxxxxxx> Should clear the next pointer of the TX if we are sure that the next TX (say NXT) will be submitted to the channel too. Overwise, we break the chain of descriptors, because we lose the information about the next descriptor to run. So next time, when invoke async_tx_run_dependencies() with TX, it's TX->next will be NULL, and NXT will be never submitted. Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c b/crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c index 85eaf7b..e8362c1 100644 --- a/crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c +++ b/crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c @@ -137,7 +137,8 @@ async_tx_run_dependencies(struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx) spin_lock_bh(&next->lock); next->parent = NULL; _next = next->next; - next->next = NULL; + if (_next && _next->chan == chan) + next->next = NULL; spin_unlock_bh(&next->lock); next->tx_submit(next); -- 1.5.6.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
