Re: Device naming and raid1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Thanks much for the reply.  For the purposes of this discussion you can
> assume that I've already re-established confidence in the drive, the
> cable, and the controller and that the data on the drives is worthless
> and I just want to get maximum uptime without causing a raid assemble
> problem on the next reboot.

Good.

>
> Any idea on my original question?  If I re-add the drive using the
> /dev/sdc name will I have problems on the next boot when the drive is
> named /dev/sda?

Since this seems to be block device it really does not matter.

> Based on my experience with Linux and other software raid
> implementations, I'm strongly inclined to think that the device naming
> doesn't matter - the system will scan the drives at boot looking for

Kindly read some decent kernel documentation before you jump up and
say this. Kindly surf the net and read some decent article's before you
do any precious upgrades for now.

Sujit

-- 
--linux(2.4/2.6),bsd(4.5.x+),solaris(2.5+)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux