A few months back, I converted my raid setup from raid5 to raid10,f2,
using the same disks and setup as before.
The setup is an AMD x86-64, 3600+ dual, making use of three 300 GB SATA disks:
The current raid looks like this:
md0 : active raid10 sdb4[0] sdc4[2] sdd4[1]
460057152 blocks 64K chunks 2 far-copies [3/3] [UUU]
bitmap: 1/439 pages [4KB], 512KB chunk, file: /md0.bitmap
/dev/md0:
Version : 00.90.03
Creation Time : Fri May 23 23:24:20 2008
Raid Level : raid10
Array Size : 460057152 (438.74 GiB 471.10 GB)
Used Dev Size : 306704768 (292.50 GiB 314.07 GB)
Raid Devices : 3
Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Intent Bitmap : /md0.bitmap
Update Time : Thu Jun 26 08:16:52 2008
State : clean
Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : near=1, far=2
Chunk Size : 64K
UUID : ff4e969d:2f07be4e:8c61e068:8406cdc0
Events : 0.1670
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 20 0 active sync /dev/sdb4
1 8 52 1 active sync /dev/sdd4
2 8 36 2 active sync /dev/sdc4
As you can see, it's comprised of 3x 292 MiB partitions (the other
partitions are unused or used for /boot, so no run-time I/O).
Individually, the disks are capable of some 70 MB/s (give or take).
The raid5 would take 2.5 hours to run a "check".
The raid10,f2 takes substantially longer:
Jun 23 02:30:01 turnip kernel: md: data-check of RAID array md0
Jun 23 07:17:46 turnip kernel: md: md0: data-check done.
Whaaa? 4.75 hours? That's 28MB/s end-to-end. That's about 40% of
actual disk speed. I expected it to be slower but not /that/ much
slower. What might be going on here?
--
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
