Re: raid10 vs raid5 - strange performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:25:31PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Christian Pernegger wrote:
> 
> The md raid10,f2 generally has modest write performance, if U is a 
> single drive speed, write might range between 1.5U to (N-1)/2*U 
> depending on tuning. Read speed is almost always (N-1)*U, which is great 
> for many applications. Playing with chunk size, chunk buffers, etc, can 
> make a large difference in write performance.

Hmm, I have other formulae for this. raid10,f2 write speed would rather
be U*N/2, and read speed be U*N - possibly enhanced by also having
bigger chunks than on a regular non-raid disk, and enhanced by lower
access times. The formulae are bothe for sequential and random reads.

Best regards
keld
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux