hi
The validity of the snipped arguments depends on how many devices you
have at every level:
*) how many nodes there are?
8 nodes
*) how many disks per node? do all nodes have an equal amount of disks?
currently there are 5 disks at every node, and yes: all nodes have equal
amount,
but the only thing that matters is that the exported size should be the same
Without additional info I would say this: The problem with using raid5
on the top node is that you are stressing your network additionally
for every r-m-w-cycle. Also rebuild of this array, especially if you
add more leaves will be more and more resource intensive.
after the new nics installed, i except that the rebuild would take about
8 hours to complete
yes, the r-m-w-cycle would be a pain - but i expect to have much more
reads than writes
this is truly resource intensive - but the bottleneck would be not at
the network level, i think it will be
at the root node's south-west connection
i must note that this is my first raid setup ;) and i've not faced with
rmw-cycle problems before,
and because the use conditions doesn't imply continous random writes -
we will be happy with this,
next week we will try it out in target conditions - and if something is
not going as expect, i will
reconsider applying raid10 to it
In contrast if the top array is RAID10 with 2 chunk copies, you will
sacrifice half the space, however your rebuild will utilize only 2
drives (one reader one writer).
yes, that clearly could reach better performance, with .5 usable space-ratio
i'm working with relatively low-budget
current ratio is: 4*7/(5*8) = .7
kirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
