Re: How many drives are bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:25:28 -0500, "Norman Elton"
>>> <normelton@xxxxxxxxx> said:

[ ... ]

normelton> The box presents 48 drives, split across 6 SATA
normelton> controllers. So disks sda-sdh are on one controller,
normelton> etc. In our configuration, I run a RAID5 MD array for
normelton> each controller, then run LVM on top of these to form
normelton> one large VolGroup.

Pure genius! I wonder how many Thumpers have been configured in
this well thought out way :-).

BTW, just to be sure -- you are running LVM in default linear
mode over those 6 RAID5s aren't you?

normelton> I found that it was easiest to setup ext3 with a max
normelton> of 2TB partitions. So running on top of the massive
normelton> LVM VolGroup are a handful of ext3 partitions, each
normelton> mounted in the filesystem.

Uhm, assuming 500GB drives each RAID set has a capacity of
3.5TB, and odds are that a bit over half of those 2TB volumes
will straddle array boundaries. Such attention to detail is
quite remarkable :-).

normelton> This less than ideal (ZFS would allow us one large
normelton> partition),

That would be another stroke of genius! (especially if you were
still using a set of underlying RAID5s instead of letting ZFS do
its RAIDZ thing). :-)

normelton> but we're rewriting some software to utilize the
normelton> multi-partition scheme.

Good luck!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux