Re: suns raid-z / zfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 09:51:15PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> Recovery after a failed drive would not be an easy operation, and I
>> cannot imagine it being even close to the raw speed of the device.
> I thought this was a problem with most raid types, while
> reconstructioning, performance is quite slow. And as there has been some

There is a difference between "recovery is quite slow" and "raid device
access is quite slow" The former is an issue since it stretches the time
where you're in non-redundant danger while the latter is just
inconvenient.


regards
   Mario
-- 
I heard, if you play a NT-CD backwards, you get satanic messages...
That's nothing. If you play it forwards, it installs NT.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux