Bill Davidsen wrote:
According to man md(4), the o2 is likely to offer the best combination
of read and write performance. Why would you consider f2 instead?
f2 is faster for read, most systems spend more time reading than writing.
According to md(4), offset "should give similar read characteristics to
'far' if a suitably large chunk size is used, but without as much
seeking for writes."
Is the man page not correct, conditionally true, or simply not
understood by me (most likely case)?
I wonder what "suitably large" is...
--
Moshe Yudkowsky * moshe@xxxxxxxxx * www.pobox.com/~moshe
"The seconds marched past, transversing that mysterious boundary that
separates the future from the past."
-- Jack Vance, "The Face"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
