Moshe Yudkowsky wrote:
Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Based on your reports of better performance on RAID10 -- which are
more significant that I'd expected -- I'll just go with RAID10. The
only question now is if LVM is worth the performance hit or not.
I would be interested if you would experiment with this wrt boot time,
for example the difference between /root on a raid5, raid10,f2 and
raid10,o2.
According to man md(4), the o2 is likely to offer the best combination
of read and write performance. Why would you consider f2 instead?
f2 is faster for read, most systems spend more time reading than writing.
I'm unlike to do any testing beyond running bonnie++ or something
similar once it's installed.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
