Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
Based on your reports of better performance on RAID10 -- which are more
significant that I'd expected -- I'll just go with RAID10. The only
question now is if LVM is worth the performance hit or not.
I would be interested if you would experiment with this wrt boot time,
for example the difference between /root on a raid5, raid10,f2 and raid10,o2.
According to man md(4), the o2 is likely to offer the best combination
of read and write performance. Why would you consider f2 instead?
I'm unlike to do any testing beyond running bonnie++ or something
similar once it's installed.
--
Moshe Yudkowsky * moshe@xxxxxxxxx * www.pobox.com/~moshe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html