Re: In this partition scheme, grub does not find md information?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:

Based on your reports of better performance on RAID10 -- which are more significant that I'd expected -- I'll just go with RAID10. The only question now is if LVM is worth the performance hit or not.

I would be interested if you would experiment with this wrt boot time,
for example the difference between /root on a raid5, raid10,f2 and raid10,o2.

According to man md(4), the o2 is likely to offer the best combination of read and write performance. Why would you consider f2 instead?

I'm unlike to do any testing beyond running bonnie++ or something similar once it's installed.


--
Moshe Yudkowsky * moshe@xxxxxxxxx * www.pobox.com/~moshe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux