There are those who believe that if you have a production system with xfs, that you should always have a UPS, because xfs journals aren't as thorough as the journals of some other filesystems, including ext3. On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 00:02 +0100, Lajber Zoltan wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, John Stoffel wrote: > > > I've been tempted by XFS at times, but I worry, esp since alot of > > other people who are core developers don't care for XFS as much. But > > maybe I'll move that way for my next system. > > We use xfs since 2.6.x in production. Typical config for us: > / in raid1, ext3 > swap in raid1 > lvm2 for the remaining with XFS above it. > > The lvm2 array raid1 or raid5. If raid1, the / and swap have hot spare > partitions. > > The main reason for this is that you can't have boot block in XFS. > > Bye, > -=Lajbi=---------------------------------------------------------------- > LAJBER Zoltan Szent Istvan Egyetem, Informatika Hivatal > Most of the time, if you think you are in trouble, crank that throttle! > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
