Re: aacraid just sucks?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Mark Hahn wrote:

> has anyone gotten good performance from aacraid?
> if you configure, say the 21610SA controller as JBOD and use
> normal Linux MD raid, can you mitigate the pain?

I have an ibm xseries 206 with aacraid:
0000:03:02.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 01)
000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82875P Memory Controller Hub (rev 02)
0000:00:03.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82875P Processor to PCI to CSA Bridge
(rev 02)
0000:00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 6300ESB 64-bit PCI-X Bridge (rev 02)

To be more verbose:
0000:03:02.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (rev 01)
        Subsystem: Adaptec AAR-2410SA PCI SATA 4ch (Jaguar II)
        Flags: bus master, fast Back2Back, 66MHz, slow devsel, latency 32,
IRQ 16
        Memory at d4000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M]
        Expansion ROM at 80100000 [disabled] [size=32K]
        Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2


With bonnie++ I can write 36M/sec, read	 59M/sec. I have four disks on it,
but _software_ raid1 with kernel.org 2.6.13.4 kernel.

Bye,
-=Lajbi=----------------------------------------------------------------
 LAJBER Zoltan               Szent Istvan Egyetem,  Informatika Hivatal
 Most of the time, if you think you are in trouble, crank that throttle!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux