On 06/21/2005 03:25 PM, Neil Brown wrote: > No.. > The 'devices=' bits by themselves aren't enough, and are rarely > wanted. > If a device isn't listed in the DEVICES lines, then it won't be > considered for use in an array. okay > The 'devices=' words are quite different. They say "this is how you > recognise a device that is in this array. All the devices in it are > on this list". > This is reported by "mdadm --detail --scan" largely for interest. It > should rarely be included in mdadm.conf. The very latest version ofn > mdadm does not report them unless --verbose is given. okay, then I have an old one, because mine gives it to me, thats why I had it in my conf file. thanks for all the help -- [ Clemens Schwaighofer -----=====:::::~ ] [ TEQUILA\ Japan IT Group ] [ 6-17-2 Ginza Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8167, JAPAN ] [ Tel: +81-(0)3-3545-7703 Fax: +81-(0)3-3545-7343 ] [ http://www.tequila.co.jp ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
