Re: from raidtools2 to mdadm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday June 21, cs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 06/21/2005 02:54 PM, Neil Brown wrote:
> 
> >>#> mdadm --detail --scan>> mdadm.conf
> >>
> >>is enought to get the raid started the next time I have to reboot
> >>the box.
> > 
> > 
> > 1/ remove the 'devices=' parts.  Then it should be ok, providing there
> >    is a suitable DEVICES line at the top.
> 
> yeah I have a devices line on the top. If I don't have, I will need the
> devices lines I guess.

No..
The 'devices=' bits by themselves aren't enough, and are rarely
wanted.
If a device isn't listed in the DEVICES lines, then it won't be
considered for use in an array.

The 'devices=' words are quite different.  They say "this is how you
recognise a device that is in this array.  All the devices in it are
on this list".
This is reported by "mdadm --detail --scan" largely for interest.  It
should rarely be included in mdadm.conf.  The very latest version ofn
mdadm does not report them unless --verbose is given.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux