Re: sata_nv and RAID1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Diego M. Vadell wrote:
But not as it is today... when you say "Cooperating devices would have to implement the ioctls." means that I have to touch sata_nv's source code to implement those ioctls, am I right? If that is all I have to do, I will give it a try (supposing my boss does not make me use the raid in the motherboard) .


The task is to update sata_nv to notify libata-core that a device has disappeared. libata-core then notifies the SCSI layer of this. No new ioctls need to be supported.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux