Re: which is better: promise fasttrak-lite 100 or linux software raid?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2004-02-17T08:37:05,
   Matt Thrailkill <xwred1@modestolan.com> said:

> A Hardware raid controller is always an add-on card, it never comes
> distributed on a motherboard. It has a bios which you can enter before
> booting into any OS and usually supports 0,1,1+0,and 5 at a minimum. It
> has a full CPU onboard that does all raid calculations and I/O, and
> displays itself to the OS as configured by the raid controller (i.e. if
> you configure a single raid 5, from 3 drives, it will show up by the OS
> as one big drive). A Hardware RAID will always be faster than a software
> raid, and consumes MUCH less CPU time.

The first part of the last sentence is wrong.


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

-- 
High Availability & Clustering	      \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs			      | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ 	-- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux