Re: multipath - stable ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The multipath code is simple and seems pretty stable to me.

There is one issue, in that failover can sometimes take a long time
because of the SCSI layer's insistence upon executing error recovery. 
In the case of multipath I/O's, there is no need to error recover before
processing the I/O.  Instead, once error is detected, failover, then
start error recovery.

The SCSI layer doesn't do this currently, so failover times are high.

Thanks
-steve


On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 21:52, Franc Carter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I've been using linux sofwtare raid for years and had no problems.
> We are about to install some disk systems that have dual contollers
> and am wondering wether multipath is as stable as the rest of software
> raid ?
> 
> thanks

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux