On Tue, 2019-10-08 at 18:29 +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > Automatic SBC profile is not going to be changed. It is there to support > all devices without any tweaks. ValdikSS already did more tests and > there are devices which do not work with higher SBC bitpool. So > increasing max value of bitpool in Automatic SBC profile would lead to > broken support for these devices and therefore regressions. > > As Automatic SBC profile is the only one available for systems where > codec switching is not supported, it would mean complete regression as > these devices completely stops working on those systems. > > Upgrading either pulseaudio or bluez must not lead to problem that some > bluetooth devices stop working (if they worked before upgrade). > > So no, there would not be any changes in Automatic SBC profile. This one > should stay untouched, to make it always working with all existing > devices without any regression. I wasn't aware that advertising the XQ settings during negotiation breaks some devices. I guess this means that JP Guillaume's SBC XQ patch can't be accepted, assuming that we value avoiding regressions more than the improved quality for most headsets? Here's that patch: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/merge_requests/177 -- Tanu https://www.patreon.com/tanuk https://liberapay.com/tanuk _______________________________________________ pulseaudio-discuss mailing list pulseaudio-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-discuss
