On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 09:11 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > On 11/03/2011 08:36 PM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > Looks good. The only complaint is about the "should never happen" > > handling. > > Would it make sense to commit this one as it is, then anyone caring > enough could make a general change of invalid -> pa_assert for all > occurences here? That would be fine by me (yes, I'm volunteering to make that change). -- Tanu
