On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 14:21 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > On 11/08/2011 11:30 AM, Arun Raghavan wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 21:04 +0200, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > >> Somehow keeping a list of profiles in the ports doesn't feel right - > >> it's as if that list would have been thrown there just to make things > >> convenient for some random code... But I guess there's a reason, which > >> just isn't apparent from this patch yet, for having that list there. > > > > This is my largest concern as well. > > There is nothing wrong with every port knowing what profiles that port > is a part of; it follows naturally with having port belonging to cards. I think I agree after all. I tried to come up with a better counterargument than "it doesn't feel right", but I failed. -- Tanu