'Twas brillig, and Tanu Kaskinen at 02/12/11 16:14 did gyre and gimble: > On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:35 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: >> On 12/02/2011 12:05 PM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: >>> 2011/12/2 David Henningsson<david.henningsson at canonical.com>: >>>> There not used for anything yet, but hopefully soon they'll be. >>> >>> I think it's a good idea to add this together with the first user of >>> the port proplist. >> >> This is the opposite to Colin's desire for a port proplist in the client >> API even though there is no immediate use. Normally I'd agree with Maarten, but in this case I'm happy to have it just pushed in here knowning that the client API is coming and will pass it across, empty or not! > I think there's no conflict. The client API would be one user of the > port proplist. Yup. > That said, I'd really like to push this patch already now, because I > want to base my own development on it, and coordinating a common > development tree with David sounds like too much hassle. Go for it, no point in causing ourselves undue hassle. Cheers Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
