On 12/02/2011 12:05 PM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > 2011/12/2 David Henningsson<david.henningsson at canonical.com>: >> There not used for anything yet, but hopefully soon they'll be. > > I think it's a good idea to add this together with the first user of > the port proplist. This is the opposite to Colin's desire for a port proplist in the client API even though there is no immediate use. > Also in the same series, please add a patch showing the port proplist > in pactl and pacmd output. Pacmd makes sense, but pactl requires protocol extensions. Will add a pacmd and resend patch. -- David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd. http://launchpad.net/~diwic
