On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 13:35 +0100, David Henningsson wrote: > On 12/02/2011 12:05 PM, Maarten Bosmans wrote: > > 2011/12/2 David Henningsson<david.henningsson at canonical.com>: > >> There not used for anything yet, but hopefully soon they'll be. > > > > I think it's a good idea to add this together with the first user of > > the port proplist. > > This is the opposite to Colin's desire for a port proplist in the client > API even though there is no immediate use. I think there's no conflict. The client API would be one user of the port proplist. That said, I'd really like to push this patch already now, because I want to base my own development on it, and coordinating a common development tree with David sounds like too much hassle. -- Tanu
