Hi, A while ago I submitted a patch. I have included an updated version of this patch that should work against the latest SVN revision. Could you guys please review the impact of this patch and consider it for inclusion in the SVN tree? Personally I am already using this patch in our own application to have better control over re-INVITEs. Thanks in advance. Ruud Klaver AG Projects -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pjsip-2421-sip_inv-on_rx_reinvite.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2989 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20090115/f56dc7a0/attachment.patch> -------------- next part -------------- On 22 Oct 2008, at 17:39, Ruud Klaver wrote: > Hi, > > Some time ago I discussed the possibility of giving the application > more control over the response to the re-INVITE in the sip_inv > module. Included is a simple patch which adds another callback to > the pjsip_inv_callback struct. > > In fact, it turned out simpler than I had imagined, since we can re- > use the pjsip_inv_initial_answer() and pjsip_inv_answer() functions > to reply to the re-INVITE. I took some time to study the code in > sip_inv.c and I believe this should work correctly. Initial tests > seem to confirm this. For more details, see the added comment in the > patch. > > Benny (and others), could you please review this patch for > inclusion? Thanks in advance. > > Ruud Klaver > AG Projects > > <pjsip-2355-sip_inv-on_rx_reinvite.patch> > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
