STUN changes in pjsip 1.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Klaus Darilion wrote:
> 
> Attached are STUN traces from QjSimple - one time using pjproject 1.3
> and one time using pjproject 1.4. Tests were performed against vovida 0.96
> 

Thanks for the files.
There is a padding problem in the STUN messages sent by pjproject 1.4.
That is the reason why the servers you've mentioned i.e.
stun.iptel.org are rejecting those messages since those are malformed.
I'll send a patch to Benny later in the day.

Cheers,
Alain


> 
> regards
> klaus
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
> 
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

-- 
                            ""
                          (o)(o)
                  ___o00o__(__)__o00o_____
1024D/A9F85A52 2000-01-18 Dipl.-Ing. Alain Totouom <totouom at gmx.de>
PGP Fingerprint   DA18 0DF2 FBD2 5F67 0656 452D E3A2 7531 A9F8 5A52



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux