On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Klaus Darilion<klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote: > > > Benny Prijono schrieb: >> >> Ah, yes, good point! It was http://trac.pjsip.org/repos/ticket/866 >> >> Basically, in pre-1.4, STUN used to be one single point of failure >> thing, if your STUN server is down the library will refuse to be >> started. With that ticket, we added support for multiple STUN servers, >> and the library checks for STUN server usability before picking one >> up. The checking uses STUN facility in PJNATH, which is mostly new >> STUN, though I thought it should be backward compatible with old STUN >> (at least it worked with Vovida STUN in >> http://www.sf.net/projects/stun) > > Are you sure? I use latest version too. > I works in several locations that I tested (including from open Internet). I use 0.96_Aug13 version. >> >> You can use stun.pjsip.org. > > Same problem. > In that case I'm not convinced the problem is in the code. Maybe some NAT filtering? Cheers Benny > klaus > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >
