On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 8:58 AM, Ruud Klaver <ruud at ag-projects.com> wrote: > Hi Benny, > On 16 Jul 2008, at 21:32, Benny Prijono wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Ruud Klaver <ruud at ag-projects.com> > > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I got an assertion failure about the 100rel module, which I indeed do > > not have initialized and do not want to use, when calling > > pjsip_inv_create_uac. It contains the following lines: > > > > 662 /* Create 100rel handler */ > > 663 pjsip_100rel_attach(inv); > > > > I think maybe the options need to be checked to see if the user even > > requested use of the 100rel functionality. > > > > > > Yeah I know. But 100rel is so tightly coupled to invite session (by > > protocol specification) that makes it hard to make it modular. So I > > decided not to add the option to exclude it. > > > > But if you don't want it, you can always exclude > > PJSIP_INV_SUPPORT_100REL flag when creating the invite session. This > > way 100rel would not be advertised in Supported header and it > > shouldn't be used. > > > > Cheers > > Benny > > Sorry, I was not clear enough in my description. Not including the > PJSIP_INV_SUPPORT_100REL flag is exactly what I did (in fact I am > setting options to 0). This gives me an assertion failure that the > module_id of the 100rel module is not 0, probably because the static > struct of this module was never initialized. > > So my point was that the above code should probably only be executed > if PJSIP_INV_SUPPORT_100REL is set. > > It's probably still the same answer. I can't remember the details, but there are other things in sip_inv.c which assumes that the 100rel module is always there, for the reason that I mentioned before. What is your concern anyway? Cheers Benny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/attachments/20080717/f661d22d/attachment.html
