<snip> Service-Route: <sip:orig at scscf.domain.net:6060;lr> that's the one I receive. </snip> So I should have received it too :) But I'm at my home desk now and, so I can't doublecheck. But I believe you, of course. Let's wait for Benny's comments. Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olivier Beytrison" <olivier@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "pjsip embedded/DSP SIP discussion" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:41 PM Subject: Re: [pjsip] Service-route overriding proxy There is a lr in the Service-Route. And looking at your message below, I guess you're using OpenIMSCore as well. Service-Route: <sip:orig at scscf.domain.net:6060;lr> that's the one I receive. Now my concern is, if we imagine the following scenario : I have 2 accounts on different operators I register on both of them, but if I have to put an outbound_proxy to the proxy of one of my operator, how am I going to contact my second operator ? I really don't think that the right way to do, and that's why I join Roland. Regards, Olivier B. Roland Klabunde a ?crit : > Hi Benny, > > Hmm. Not sure. My montiorings: > > 1) No specification of service-route in config > * Register OK, server returns service route pointing to scscf:6060 > * Invite is blocked by the registrar with error "Bad request - not > following > indicated service route". The request has been sent to pcscf:5060 > > 2) Specification of service-route in config > * Register as above > * Invite is now sent to scscf:6060 (as specified in service route). This > ends up in no response. > > Shouldn't the Ua send the Invite to pcscf:5060, providing the received > service route somewhere in the INVITE header in order to let the pcscf > know, > where to route the request? > > As far as I can remember there was no ;lr in the service route. What would > that change (besides the fact that I can't control the IMS platform)? > > Regards > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Benny Prijono" <bennylp@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "pjsip embedded/DSP SIP discussion" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:23 PM > Subject: Re: [pjsip] Service-route overriding proxy > > >> Roland Klabunde wrote: >>> The current Service-Route handling seems to be wrong. >>> We believe that Service-Route should be copied to the Route element of >>> any >>> SIP request following a REGISTER, but shouldn't be used as target for >>> e.g. INVITES. >> Could this be because of the lack of ";lr" in the S-R URI? >> >> -benny >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org -- Olivier Beytrison Telecommunication Engineer Mobile: +41 (0)78 619 73 53 Mail: olivier at heliosnet.org GPG: 0x4FB83528 http://pgp.mit.edu/ _______________________________________________ Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org pjsip mailing list pjsip at lists.pjsip.org http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
