[pjsip] Service-route overriding proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is a lr in the Service-Route. And looking at your message below, I
guess you're using OpenIMSCore as well.

Service-Route: <sip:orig at scscf.domain.net:6060;lr>
that's the one I receive.

Now my concern is, if we imagine the following scenario :
I have 2 accounts on different operators

I register on both of them, but if I have to put an outbound_proxy to
the proxy of one of my operator, how am I going to contact my second
operator ?

I really don't think that the right way to do, and that's why I join Roland.

Regards,

Olivier B.

Roland Klabunde a ?crit :
> Hi Benny,
> 
> Hmm. Not sure. My montiorings:
> 
> 1) No specification of service-route in config
> * Register OK, server returns service route pointing to scscf:6060
> * Invite is blocked by the registrar with error "Bad request - not following 
> indicated service route". The request has been sent to pcscf:5060
> 
> 2) Specification of service-route in config
> * Register as above
> * Invite is now sent to scscf:6060 (as specified in service route). This 
> ends up in no response.
> 
> Shouldn't the Ua send the Invite to pcscf:5060, providing the received 
> service route somewhere in the INVITE header in order to let the pcscf know, 
> where to route the request?
> 
> As far as I can remember there was no ;lr in the service route. What would 
> that change (besides the fact that I can't control the IMS platform)?
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Benny Prijono" <bennylp@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "pjsip embedded/DSP SIP discussion" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [pjsip] Service-route overriding proxy
> 
> 
>> Roland Klabunde wrote:
>>> The current Service-Route handling seems to be wrong.
>>> We believe that Service-Route should be copied to the Route element of 
>>> any
>>> SIP request following a REGISTER, but shouldn't be used as target for
>>> e.g. INVITES.
>> Could this be because of the lack of ";lr" in the S-R URI?
>>
>>  -benny
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
> 
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip at lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

-- 

 Olivier Beytrison
 Telecommunication Engineer
 Mobile: +41 (0)78 619 73 53
 Mail: olivier at heliosnet.org
 GPG: 0x4FB83528 http://pgp.mit.edu/



[Index of Archives]     [Asterisk Users]     [Asterisk App Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux