Hi Benny, Hmm. Not sure. My montiorings: 1) No specification of service-route in config * Register OK, server returns service route pointing to scscf:6060 * Invite is blocked by the registrar with error "Bad request - not following indicated service route". The request has been sent to pcscf:5060 2) Specification of service-route in config * Register as above * Invite is now sent to scscf:6060 (as specified in service route). This ends up in no response. Shouldn't the Ua send the Invite to pcscf:5060, providing the received service route somewhere in the INVITE header in order to let the pcscf know, where to route the request? As far as I can remember there was no ;lr in the service route. What would that change (besides the fact that I can't control the IMS platform)? Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "Benny Prijono" <bennylp@xxxxxxxxx> To: "pjsip embedded/DSP SIP discussion" <pjsip at lists.pjsip.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:23 PM Subject: Re: [pjsip] Service-route overriding proxy > Roland Klabunde wrote: >> The current Service-Route handling seems to be wrong. >> We believe that Service-Route should be copied to the Route element of >> any >> SIP request following a REGISTER, but shouldn't be used as target for >> e.g. INVITES. > > Could this be because of the lack of ";lr" in the S-R URI? > > -benny > > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip at lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >
