Roland Klabunde wrote: > Hi Benny, > > Hmm. Not sure. My montiorings: > > 1) No specification of service-route in config > * Register OK, server returns service route pointing to scscf:6060 > * Invite is blocked by the registrar with error "Bad request - not following > indicated service route". The request has been sent to pcscf:5060 > > 2) Specification of service-route in config > * Register as above > * Invite is now sent to scscf:6060 (as specified in service route). This > ends up in no response. > > Shouldn't the Ua send the Invite to pcscf:5060, providing the received > service route somewhere in the INVITE header in order to let the pcscf know, > where to route the request? Frankly I'm not sure. I thought that if PCSCF wants to stay in the path of subsequent requests, it should have been added in the S-R list by the registrar. That's what I concluded from (briefly) looking at the examples in RFC 3608. Or is this a wrong interpretation? -benny > As far as I can remember there was no ;lr in the service route. What would > that change (besides the fact that I can't control the IMS platform)? > > Regards
