On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 10:35 -0400, tedd wrote: > At 3:27 PM +0200 9/11/09, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > >That's a finished production site ... how did you debug during its > >development? 'Cause Formaldehyde is for development, not for > >production ... I guess you have implented your own error > >manager/debugger, right? > > What's to debug? > > The site -- > > http://webbytedd.com/a/ajax-site/ > > -- uses a very simple ajax script, namely: > > http://webbytedd.com/a/ajax-site/js/a.js > > Outside of that, everything else is done in php, html, and css, which > is completely separate from ajax. I can create a very extensive and > complicated site using that simple ajax routine without any > alteration whatsoever. I don't need a debugger because I never touch > the code. > > Now maybe I'm not getting it, but from my perspective ajax is pretty > simple. The point I'm getting at is that ajax is simply a method of > communication -- you send stuff and you read stuff. You don't need to > rewrite the US Postal Service every time you send/receive a letter. > > Cheers, > > tedd > -- > ------- > http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com > I agree. I tend to reuse the same basic functionality whenever I use AJAX. With some half-decent unit-testing, you can debug the Javascript parts easily enough. Thanks, Ash http://www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
