On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 18:10 +0000, Nathan Rixham wrote: > Jochem Maas wrote: > > Per Jessen schreef: > >> Nathan Rixham wrote: > >> > >>> Per Jessen wrote: > >>>> Nathan Rixham wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't/shouldn't have > >>>>>> strong > >>>>>> and loose typing in the same language. In my opinion. > >>>>> "Instead of providing programmers with a black or white choice > >>>>> between static or dynamic typing, we should instead strive for > >>>>> softer type systems. That is, static typing where possible, dynamic > >>>>> typing when needed. Unfortunately there is a discontinuity between > >>>>> contemporary statically typed and dynamically typed languages as > >>>>> well as a huge technical and cultural gap between the respective > >>>>> language communities." > >>>> I'm not sure whether to take you seriously now - you're quoting from > >>>> a Microsoft research paper? :-) > >>> lol well picked up - for all I'm a linux fan M$ aren't all bad and > >>> hell they must have some very good programmers in the various teams, > >>> seems a shame to invalidate thier hard work and research just because > >>> they work for satan. > >> Completely agree, I just thought I'd score an easy point ... > > > > +1 to you both :-) > > > > omfg positivety returns to the list :-D cheers guys! BoooooooooooooooooooOOO! If it doesn't degrade again soon, I tossing my popcorn and going outside to play! >:) Cheers, Rob. -- http://www.interjinn.com Application and Templating Framework for PHP -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
