Per Jessen schreef: > Nathan Rixham wrote: > >> Per Jessen wrote: >>> Nathan Rixham wrote: >>> >>>>> You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't/shouldn't have >>>>> strong >>>>> and loose typing in the same language. In my opinion. >>>> "Instead of providing programmers with a black or white choice >>>> between static or dynamic typing, we should instead strive for >>>> softer type systems. That is, static typing where possible, dynamic >>>> typing when needed. Unfortunately there is a discontinuity between >>>> contemporary statically typed and dynamically typed languages as >>>> well as a huge technical and cultural gap between the respective >>>> language communities." >>> I'm not sure whether to take you seriously now - you're quoting from >>> a Microsoft research paper? :-) >> lol well picked up - for all I'm a linux fan M$ aren't all bad and >> hell they must have some very good programmers in the various teams, >> seems a shame to invalidate thier hard work and research just because >> they work for satan. > > Completely agree, I just thought I'd score an easy point ... +1 to you both :-) > > > /Per Jessen, Zürich > > -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
