Re: Re: Why MS Won't Retire Browsers -- was: Interntet Explorer 8 beater 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ashley Sheridan schreef:
On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 17:27 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
Boyd, Todd M. schreef:
-----Original Message-----
...

...

I'm not a big fan of Windows in any of it's incarnations, but I think it
is a little unfair to compare it to the Mac OS and say that Microshaft
(as I will now refer to them) has had more time and comes out with
something not as good. Admittedly, I do think this is the case, but you
have to take into consideration the main advantage Apple has: it only
has to write an OS for a very limited set of hardware it controls. A
typical PC usually comprises of dozens of dozens of bits of kit, and
there are literally infinite hardware configurations a user can have.


let's be clear neither company *has* to do anything, it's their choice,
it therefore seems that Apple is smarter in that it bite's off pretty much
what it can chew. given the pretty much total control M$ has over distribution
channels it wouldn't be that hard for them to 'convince' harware manufacturers
to standardize to a limited set of approved hardware elements if that's what
they really wanted.

I'm a big fan of Linux, but I think partly that's because I know what
I'm doing. Sure, I run into troubles, but that's because I can't leave
alone and keep tinkering! As an OS, it's very stable, and very fast.
Just today I was playing WoW and had the Windows computer crash on me,
despite it only running the game and an antivirus!

so the GNU/Linux kernel is comparitively stable and very fast, blows windows
kernel right out of the water ... and linux OSes generally run on pretty much
anything windows will run on (and more besides) ... which kind of puts the
'M$ has to support infinite hardware configurations' argument into perspective.

obviously linux isn't developed on thin air and recieves plenty of corporate
sponsorship (hello IBM :-)) but it's chump change compared to what M$ pump into
their OS development.

Also, to say that the number of Linux distros out is just
counter-productive to the Linux cause, well, the point is it's all about
choice. The average Joe in the street only knows (and only really needs
to know) about 2 or 3 if that. Compare this with the various "distros"
of Vista that the man-in-the-shop will try to sell you (there's 4
altogether I believe) and the picture doesn't seem to to be so straight
laced. The best part about having so many distros is that the people who
know what they're doing have the choice, because frankly there is no way
on earth anyone is going to give Debian to a Linux newbie, and if they
do they should be taken out and shot!

having the choice of 100 different makes of toothpaste is not choice so much
as manufactured consent. the concept of choice is taken to be some absolute
good, if it is then why do the vast majority people keep buying M$? why are
there only *2* political parties in the US (are you telling me they really
cover all the various views/opinions/beliefs/whatever of all the people that
live there)?

the important thing about choice is giving people the appearance of choice
when there is [usually] no choice at all.

I'm not advocating one size fits all, merely suggesting that the choice one
makes should be dictated by requirement and not through the vain efforts of
some marketing department. I mean what's the practical difference between
SuSE and Ubuntu once you strip all the corporate bling?

offering a number of items that do exactly the same as being different merely
sells into people's mistaken belief that they are free because they have 'choice'.

When you think about it though at the end of the day, despite the sheer
amount of hardware there is out there, Linux still managed to give
Windows a run for it's money, despite most of the time and code being
donated to the cause. That might be part of the reason though, everyone
spends their time trying to make things work together, rather than the
Microshaft way of trying to stop things working in order to force users
to switch to their own products. This isn't just an opinion, it's a well
documented marketing strategy they've used for years.

indeed, give someone enough money and greed generally sets in with all the
inherent ramifications.


Anyway, that's just my 2p ;)

which is what your left with after paying all the bills, dang the UK is
way too expensive :-)

Ash
www.ashleysheridan.co.uk




--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


[Index of Archives]     [PHP Home]     [Apache Users]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Install]     [PHP Classes]     [Pear]     [Postgresql]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP on Windows]     [PHP Database Programming]     [PHP SOAP]

  Powered by Linux