Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Robert Cummings" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
From: "Bastien Koert" <phpster@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:45:47 -0400
Cc: "Ray Hauge" <ray.hauge.lists@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jay Blanchard" <jblanchard@xxxxxxxxxx>, php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1209188657.27601.151.camel@blobule>

On 4/26/08, Robert Cummings <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Wow, that's umm hideous.
>
> Cheers,
> Rob.
>
>
>
> yep, but i did say it was old
>
> --
>
> Bastien
>
> Cat, the other other white meat

References:
- peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
  - From: Jay Blanchard
- Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
  - From: Ray Hauge
- Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
  - From: Bastien Koert
- Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
  - From: Robert Cummings

Prev by Date: Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
Next by Date: IMAP errors
Previous by thread: Re: peer review (was php framework vs just php?)
Next by thread: OS need anything for mail() to work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [PHP Home] [Apache Users] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Install] [PHP Classes] [Pear] [Postgresql] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP on Windows] [PHP Database Programming] [PHP SOAP]

Powered by Linux