On Dec 19, 2007 11:53 AM, Daniel Brown <parasane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM, Richard Lynch <ceo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, December 19, 2007 9:31 am, Richard Heyes wrote:
> > >>> I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the
> > >>> Reply-To header isn't worth beans.
> > >>
> > >> very very true
> > >
> > > Well the Reply-To: header isn't for bounces.
> >
> > The OP was asking about Return-path, not Reply-to
> >
> > Furthermore, while the MTA/client/MUA may not be worth beans, that
> > doesn't mean nobody is using it.
> >
> > I don't think any MS products are worth beans; Yet many people are
> > using them. Should I not bother to check IE compatibility?
>
> Actual code from a live page of mine. Just because I could. ;-P
>
> <?
> if(!stristr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],"mozilla")) {
> die("We only allow Mozilla browsers in here!\n");
> }
> ?>
>
> DISCLAIMER: Yes, lawyers, I'm aware that client headers can be forged.
Fine, if by "Mozilla browsers" you mean IE as well, even though it
isn't even remotely Mozilla or any derivative thereof. Pretty good at
keeping out most bots, though.
Andrew
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
