Daniel Brown wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM, Richard Lynch <ceo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, December 19, 2007 9:31 am, Richard Heyes wrote:
I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the
Reply-To header isn't worth beans.
very very true
Well the Reply-To: header isn't for bounces.
The OP was asking about Return-path, not Reply-to
Furthermore, while the MTA/client/MUA may not be worth beans, that
doesn't mean nobody is using it.
I don't think any MS products are worth beans; Yet many people are
using them. Should I not bother to check IE compatibility?
Actual code from a live page of mine. Just because I could. ;-P
<?
if(!stristr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],"mozilla")) {
die("We only allow Mozilla browsers in here!\n");
}
?>
You could, but you didn't!! This is a typical user agent provided by IE7...
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)
All IE browsers since the beginning of time have sent a user agent
containing "mozilla".
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
