Daniel Brown wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:18 AM, Richard Lynch <ceo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, December 19, 2007 9:31 am, Richard Heyes wrote:
>>>>> I think that any MTA or client that doesn't work with the
>>>>> Reply-To header isn't worth beans.
>>>> very very true
>>> Well the Reply-To: header isn't for bounces.
>> The OP was asking about Return-path, not Reply-to
>>
>> Furthermore, while the MTA/client/MUA may not be worth beans, that
>> doesn't mean nobody is using it.
>>
>> I don't think any MS products are worth beans; Yet many people are
>> using them. Should I not bother to check IE compatibility?
>
> Actual code from a live page of mine. Just because I could. ;-P
>
> <?
> if(!stristr($_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'],"mozilla")) {
> die("We only allow Mozilla browsers in here!\n");
> }
> ?>
>
> DISCLAIMER: Yes, lawyers, I'm aware that client headers can be forged.
>
I was just about to say the same thing!
--
Jim Lucas
"Some men are born to greatness, some achieve greatness,
and some have greatness thrust upon them."
Twelfth Night, Act II, Scene V
by William Shakespeare
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
