Jorge González wrote:
Stut escribió:
Jorge González wrote:
Ok, you both are right but not what I need because web servers is for
shared hosting with PHP then each user choose the way to develop
their apps. Then one user maybe store sessions in DB but another one
not. This should be on Apache or OS side. It's because I talk about
ldirector, LVS and so
I know this is a PHP and not an Apache list but maybe someone is
doing this with web hosting...
Not only is this a PHP list, but your problem is a PHP problem. I'm
shocked. No, really.
Ok :)
Indeed it is.
Apache does *not* get involved in sessions. Not at all.
Well the question is I was dealing with an Apache mod_proxy_balanced and
plans to use LVS or ldirector for balancing between backend servers. I
didn't know about other solutions.
That doesn't change the fact that Apache does not get involved in
sessions. Nor does mod_proxy_balanced, LVS or ldirector. Sessions are a
PHP entity. The only part of them that leaves the PHP part of the
solution is the session identifier which travels in cookies and/or URLs.
Just to clarify, you're building a shared hosting system that load
balances all sites across a cluster of web servers? If not, please
explain what it is you're actually trying to do.
yes, that is, and sessions are important. Users's session must be
persistent in all cases: web server down, user jumpig between backend
web servers, etc
In that case you need to make sure you explain to your users/customers
that they cannot use a custom session handler and expect it to work.
-Stut
--
http://stut.net/
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php