While Jim does have a point and is limited by the threading algorithm of this list manager, someone can successfully argue that "this standard" has it's drawbacks. It is somewhat intuitive to pick up a message all pre addressed and reply to all, especially when your intention is to send a message that will "reach all". It is also somewhat intuitive to think that changing the subject means starting a new thread, however with thread id's hidden in the headers, this doesn't work. You CAN argue that standards that don't work are a bad thing, or at least, not a GOOD thing. I don't, however, have a good solution, since basing threads on subject lines has a different set of drawbacks like lots of broken or disjointed threads that have a beginning in another thread. These hidden ID's keep things together but they also generate lots of off topic discussion within a thread, like we are doing here ;-), pretty soon we should hear from those police. Warren Vail -----Original Message----- From: Stut [mailto:stuttle@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 12:58 PM To: Warren Vail Cc: 'Jim Lucas'; 'Chris Ditty'; php-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Job Opportunity Warren Vail wrote: > Too bad we have to constrain our messages to fit the threading algorithm of > your list server. Another case of where man becomes servant to the machine? > 8-) Jim has a point. Hi-jacking a thread by hitting reply to all and changing the subject line messes with the *standard* threading mechanism, and nobody can successfully argue that standards are a bad thing. It has nothing to do with Jim's setup. -Stut -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
