Re: Mirrorless camera?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You are wrong about the sensor.  It was made specifically for the SL and not by Sony.  It has no low-pass filter so it's sharper and has greater dynamic range.  Just read any of the reviews and comparisons to the Sony.  I have been waiting for Leica to come out with an auto-focus camera and am not disappointed at all in this one.  I hated the Fujis and Sonys that I've tried.  The buttons on this one are very Leica-like and logical without having to go through layers and layers of menus.  I'm very happy with it.

Tina

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 5:59 PM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My issue there is that the Leica bodies are nothing more then 2 gen old sony sensors in a nice body.   Unless you have a lot of leica glass you are just going to get better performance from the same leica glass on a Sony A7r or A7r2.   The SL is not waterproof its weather sealed which is huge difference.    

You can also start off with a cheap a6000 aps-c and all the Sony mount lenses will work with the a7 series.   (and will all the adapters)  You just want to buy the Full frame version of the lenses.  
            


On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Tina Manley <images@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I absolutely love my Leica SL and it uses all Leica lenses, M and R, and Canon with an adapter.  The M240 will, too, and it's smaller.  The SL is waterproof and built like a tank.

Tina

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Lea Murphy <lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can anyone on this list weigh in on mirrorless camera suggestions for someone who wants to be able to use both Leica glass as well as Canon L glass with it?

Thank you.

Lea

your kids . my camera . we'll click




--




--

[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux