Re: Lens Question

[Jan Faul <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

My 18mm from 1972 was used for a portrait of Joe Hirschhorn and it so soft I am embarrassed. I shot it at f11, but it did not help.

On Aug 30, 2015, at 8:10 PM, Klaus Knuth msn <klausknuth@xxxxxxx> wrote:

I think they’ve improved.  My 85 is nothing to sneeze at.

Klaus

On Aug 30, 2015, at 1:58 AM, Randy Little <randyslittle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Sigma lens are hit or miss.   Can be good and can have problems.   When they are right they are fine.  So make sure to test the lens before you buy it because having the left side of your work be out of focus while the right is super sharp can be frustrating.  

Randy S. Little
http://www.rslittle.com/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/

On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Russ <rebphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Gang....

Does anyone have any opinions or experience
with this lens...........

Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM Lens for Nikon Digital Cameras


--
Russ

R.E. Baker Photography

www.rebphoto.smugmug.com

Feed a Cat...
Starve a Fever.....

Art Faul

The Artist Formerly Known as Prints

------

Art for Cars: art4carz.com

Stills That Move: http://www.artfaul.com

Greens: http://www.inkjetprince.com

Camera Works - The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/battlefieldparks/front_qt.htm

ArtNet: http://www.artnet.com/artists/jan+w.-faul/

.