On Sat, January 19, 2013 9:10 am, Andrew Davidhazy wrote: > http://people.rit.edu/andpph/gallery.html > > John Palcewski - Subway This is interesting in an odd, voyeristic way. We are at a low angle (presumably because you were shooting from the hip), but he is an interesting, intense-looking character. I like how the Exit arrow is pointing at his upper head; it was probably just a happy accident. I don't like the last fellow looking at the camera, but you take what you can get. > Rob Talbot - 53.139444,-4.275315 Well, I went there with google maps, and then to street view, and damned if there weren't three bicycle racks in a row! I'm not sure what to think of the photo, though; it isn't really compelling, but they are not entirely unattractive, either, with the bands of pavement above them. > Bobbi Blazy - Dandelion This is incredible. Really. I don't know what you did in post, and I don't care. It's excellent. Insect-like, mandala-like. > Dan Mitchell - Snow Land This is infrared in feel. The composition isn't bad, it just feels a little uncomfortable, with the empty space on the left, the large tree off the frame, and a lot of nearly blank sky. It *might* work better with the tree wholly in the frame and less sky, or perhaps in a tighter crop of less tree and more house. > Randy Little - This image is much larger than this gallery's requirements. It is also out of focus, unexposed, and oddly tinted. I assume all of these were intentional. > Bob McCulloch - Storm at National Harbor This image is a little small to really see well. From the title of the photograph, it seems that you'd like the clouds to be the subject, but the triangular warning sign is dead center, and commands my attention. The leading line of the bridge even leads right to it. > Marilyn Dalrymple - Cactus Flower: Brasilicereus Phaeacanthus This image is also too small to really see well. What I can see I like, but it looks like the highlights are somewhat blown out. But because the image is so small, I can't really be sure if there are any details in the highlights or not. I enjoyed your description. > Jan Faul - William Patterson House, Gettysburg FINAL I already commented on this image the last time you submitted it. I appreciate that you worked hard to remove all those elements we cannot see (the viewer, of course, rarely cares about how much work goes into a photograph, they only care about what they can see now), but the image does not improve for me the second time I see it. Andrew
