On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:53 AM, John Palcewski <palcewski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Part of a lack of response may well be because many--myself
included--believe that it's a good practice to never argue a critique
but to carefully consider what's said, heed what's useful, and let the
rest pass. Because there is no such thing as an aesthetic absolute by
which art (photographic or otherwise) can be measured, a critique is
but an _expression_ of personal opinion. Furthermore, on most subjects
or issues, the public is almost invariably evenly divided, 50 percent
are for, and 50 percent are against.
On 8/17/12, asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <asharpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Interesting. Nobody said a word about my feedback. I'm fairly sure it was
> sent, as I received it back from the list. That's fine, I suppose, but a
> bit discouraging; a bit like trying to carry a conversation with a cliff
> face. In fact, as far as I could tell, nobody else said a word about this
> week's offering. Ah, well. perhaps next time.
>
> Andrew
--
Please visit
https://sites.google.com/site/rjmccullochphotographer/
Check out
http://robert-mcculloch.fineartamerica.com
