Yep.....
But I can do better with an old Canon 10d
than my neighbor can do with his $3000.00
Swartzoflex 5000!!!!!!
Russ
On 9/22/2011 12:29 PM, Bob wrote:
Russ,
You are completely ignoring the basic rule of today's
technology..... NNBNDNHI......
Not Needed But Next
Door Neighbor Has It
Bob
Money can't buy happiness--- But
somehow it's more comfortable to cry in a Porsche than a Kia.
On 9/22/2011 12:17 PM, Russ wrote:
Hi Gang..............
Now here is something I don't understand.................
Why is it when people talk about the "cons" of digital
they always mention that you have to up grade every
two years?
I used a Canon 10d for long time and since I was getting
great results with it I never saw the need to up grade.
At one point I got a large payment on a job and since I saw
the need for a second body I bought a 30d, this was when the
50d was in production. I didn't see the need to spend a
fortune
on the newest technology when I didn't need it.
After my camera equipment was recently stolen,
I bought a Nikon D90 .............not the most recent
technology!
If I am getting great results with the equipment I currently
have.....
Isn't buying new stuff every year or so more like
"Keeping up with the Jones'"
Than actually needing or requiring to have a new camera?
Russ R.E. Baker Photography
www.rebphoto.smugmug.com
Feed a Cat...
Starve a Fever.....
--
Russ
R.E. Baker Photography
www.rebphoto.smugmug.com
Feed a Cat...
Starve a Fever.....
|
