That can work with a non pro, but if you do that you are making compromises. Pros to compete with other pros usually have to be working with something close to top of the line. Yet as technology marches on computers quit and the new ones won't run the old software. The new bodies have features that DO improve your work and improvements in the chip do improve the quality of the files. Better resolution, bigger file size ect but all other things being equal, you work suffers if you don't upgrade. Maybe your type of work doesn't make those advances important, but that makes it a limitation now not a choice. At 8x10 a 10d did ok, but go bigger and you were going to run into limitations. Unless you take enough that you can throw away a body in 2 years, for most pros its not cheaper
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Everybody Is A Photographer
From: Russ <rebphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, September 22, 2011 11:17 am
To: List for Photo/Imaging Educators - Professionals - Students
<photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Gang..............
Now here is something I don't understand.................
Why is it when people talk about the "cons" of digital
they always mention that you have to up grade every
two years?
I used a Canon 10d for long time and since I was getting
great results with it I never saw the need to up grade.
At one point I got a large payment on a job and since I saw
the need for a second body I bought a 30d, this was when the
50d was in production. I didn't see the need to spend a fortune
on the newest technology when I didn't need it.
After my camera equipment was recently stolen,
I bought a Nikon D90 .............not the most recent technology!
If I am getting great results with the equipment I currently have.....
Isn't buying new stuff every year or so more like
"Keeping up with the Jones'"
Than actually needing or requiring to have a new camera?
Russ R.E. Baker Photography
www.rebphoto.smugmug.com
Feed a Cat...
Starve a Fever.....
