Re: How many----?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, October 22, 2009 22:45, karl shah-jenner wrote:
> Tina writes:
>
> Herschel wrote:
>> 6x7 (Film) is excellent for modern food photography because of the
>> shallow depth of field due to the larger format . You just can't get
>> those shots with the medium format digital backs and certainly not
>> with "35mm" DSLRs
>
> | But you can get them with a digital rangefinder - Leica M9 - and Leica
> | lenses wide open.
>
>
>
> I had a Canon f0.95 lens on one of my 35mm cameras, and even with that
> shallow a DoF there was no comparison - the larger formats beat the
> stuffing out of it for shallow DoF and out of focus backgrounds
>
>
>
> I'm with Herschel on this - a shallow DoF is a beauiful thing, and
> something which keeps steering me back to film.  I have in 35mm, a 400:4.5
> and a 135:2 to play with .. and no digital body to take advantage of these
> beauties

Seems like rather long focal lengths for food specifically.

For the food situation, what about T/S lenses used perversely (i.e. to
reduce rather than increase apparent DOF)?

-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@xxxxxxxx; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux